BTCC / BTCC Square / Ethereum News /
Ethereum Community Backlash: Ledger’s Multisig Fee Controversy Highlights Centralization Tensions

Ethereum Community Backlash: Ledger’s Multisig Fee Controversy Highlights Centralization Tensions

Published:
2025-10-27 06:49:19
7
3
[TRADE_PLUGIN]ETHUSDT,ETHUSDT[/TRADE_PLUGIN]

Ledger's recent redesign of its multi-signature interface has ignited significant controversy within the cryptocurrency community, particularly among Ethereum users and developers. The hardware wallet company's updated platform now imposes additional transaction fees of $10 per transaction plus 0.05% on token transfers, costs that are separate from standard network gas fees. This move has drawn sharp criticism from prominent Ethereum developer pcaversaccio, who accused Ledger of abandoning its Cypherpunk principles and moving toward centralized control. The backlash highlights ongoing tensions in the crypto space between user-friendly solutions and the foundational principles of decentralization. As of October 2025, this development raises important questions about the balance between commercial sustainability and the core values that have driven cryptocurrency adoption. The fee structure particularly affects Ethereum-based transactions and could influence how hardware wallet companies approach service monetization in the future. This controversy emerges at a time when the Ethereum ecosystem continues to evolve, with users increasingly concerned about maintaining the decentralized ethos that has characterized the space since its inception. The situation demonstrates how fee structures and business models remain contentious issues as cryptocurrency services mature and seek sustainable revenue streams while navigating community expectations.

Ledger’s New Multisig App Sparks Backlash Over Additional Fees

Ledger’s redesigned multi-signature interface has drawn sharp criticism for introducing transaction fees that many users deem excessive. The update, aimed at simplifying cross-wallet transactions, now imposes a $10 charge per transaction and a 0.05% fee on token transfers—costs separate from network gas fees.

Ethereum developer pcaversaccio accused Ledger of abandoning its Cypherpunk roots, arguing the MOVE centralizes control and funnels users toward proprietary infrastructure. CEO Charles Guillemet initially miscommunicated the fee structure, calling it free before attributing the error to a typo—further eroding trust.

Despite the controversy, Ledger maintains dominance in hardware wallets, with 7.5 million devices sold and claims to secure 20% of global digital assets. Its unbreached track record contrasts with growing discontent over monetizing security features once marketed as self-sovereign.

Ethereum Tests $4,000 Resistance Amid ETF Outflows

Ethereum hovers NEAR $3,900, repeatedly testing but failing to sustain a break above the psychologically significant $4,000 level. Market analysts eye $3,800 as a critical support zone, with Ted Pillows suggesting a retest may precede any meaningful upward movement.

The cryptocurrency faces headwinds from institutional flows, with ethereum ETFs bleeding $93 million in outflows—BlackRock alone offloaded $101 million worth of ETH. Despite short-term pressure, long-term projections remain aggressively bullish. Fundstrat's Tom Lee posits a fundamental valuation between $12,000-$22,000, while consensus estimates target $10,000 by 2027.

Current trading at $3,926.50 reflects a market balancing immediate technical resistance against structural optimism. Historical patterns show Ethereum has respected the $3,800 support level during previous corrections, making it a key pivot for traders.

Vitalik Buterin Highlights Off-Chain Security Risks in Blockchain Systems

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has issued a stark warning about the limitations of blockchain security, emphasizing that protections for on-chain assets do not extend to off-chain activities managed by validators. While cryptographic safeguards prevent even a 51% validator collusion from stealing funds on-chain, off-chain dependencies like oracle data feeds and bridges remain vulnerable to validator misconduct.

Polygon CTO Mudit Gupta echoed these concerns, noting that validators can still exploit users through maximal extractable value (MEV) or censorship—risks that platforms like EigenLayer aim to mitigate through slashing mechanisms. The revelation underscores a critical gap in decentralized systems: trust in validators replaces algorithmic certainty for off-chain operations.

JPYC Inc. Launches Japan’s First Regulated Yen-Backed Stablecoin

JPYC Inc., a Japanese fintech firm, has rolled out the country's inaugural yen-pegged stablecoin under full regulatory compliance. The Financial Services Agency-approved JPYC stablecoin began trading Monday on the company's proprietary JPYC EX platform, backed 1:1 by yen reserves and government bonds.

The multi-chain asset operates across Ethereum, Avalanche, and Polygon networks, targeting institutional and retail users with verified 'My Number' identities. With ambitions to circulate ¥10 trillion ($65.4 billion) within three years, JPYC could emerge as Asia's answer to dominant dollar-pegged stablecoins like Tether and USD Coin.

Industry observers note the project's corporate partnerships and blockchain interoperability focus mirror global stablecoin maturation trends. The launch coincides with growing Japanese institutional interest in compliant digital asset solutions following recent crypto exchange regulations.

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.